Category: Uncategorized

  • Plantronics Discovery 925

    Last July, a law requiring hands-free cell phone usage while driving went into effect in California. As a fine, law-abiding citizen, I decided to ditch the somewhat crummy hands-free set that came with my phone, and buy a Bluetooth headset. I don’t often talk on the phone while driving, but I figured that a wireless headset would be more comfortable than a wired one. There isn’t an easily-accessible place to set my phone in my car, which made using the wired hands-free kit somewhat awkward.

    After shopping around a bit, I realized that prices in local stores (like Fry’s) were jacked up, to take advantage of the rush to comply with the law. No headsets were on sale, period, and I was thinking about just getting a basic model to avoid laying out a bunch of cash on something I wasn’t sure I’d use often. Fortunately, I decided to check on Amazon, where I discovered that the prices were much more reasonable. I noticed that the Plantronics Discovery 925 was extremely cheap on Amazon – about half off list price, and half off what I had seen it for locally – and it had great reviews, to boot. (Strangely, the other colors are now cheaper still – the gold-colored one is about $15 cheaper than the black one I have!) I ordered one for me, and another for Sandy – about $75 apiece.

    After a few months’ usage, I have to say that I’m really happy with it. The sound quality is great, and it doesn’t have a ear-loop that would interfere with my glasses. It’s comfortable, light, and remains in place securely even if I’m moving around or being jostled. The charger case is small, and contains its own battery so you can recharge the earpiece from the case on-the-go. I can also use the voice dialing feature with my phone, making most of my phone calls a truly hands-free experience. It’s convenient enough that I actually use it when I’m at home, too, if someone calls me on my cell phone. I can talk to someone and still do other things like chores at the same time, which simply wasn’t possible when I had to hold the phone to my ear.

    Overall, I would say it’s money well spent, and I can definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a Bluetooth headset.

  • Life Imitates Hitman: Blood Money

    The article: Actor Cuts Throat on Stage in Knife Mix-Up.

    I immediately thought of the Curtains Down level in Hitman: Blood Money, where you can take care of one of your targets by swapping out a prop pistol for a real one. (The target is normally shot in the head with a prop pistol, as part of the opera.)

    Fortunately, the actor in the article recovered, and the incident appears to have been the result of incompetence rather than malice.

  • Asymptotic Career

    Looks like Cuttino Mobley is hanging up his jersey for good, due to a previously-undiagnosed heart condition.

    Now I feel a bit mean for cracking wise about his “asymptotic” condition.

  • Cuttino Mobley’s Heart Rate Goes to Zero As Mike Dunleavy Approaches Infinity

    Here’s a link to the original story.

    The source said Mobley would see a heart specialist on Tuesday. Normally players have 48 hours to report to their new teams and take a physical examination, followed by another 24 hours for all the test results to come in. Because this trade was completed after business hours on Friday, the teams agreed to an additional 24-hour period, which ends at 6:30 p.m. ET Tuesday.

    When asked about ESPN.com’s report by reporters after the Clippers game on Monday, coach Mike Dunleavy said: "From the standpoint of Cuttino’s concern, there’s nothing they have or don’t have that hasn’t been known to us or hasn’t been approved by us and all the other teams he’s played for. Neither one of those guys has had any issues with any of the things that are even being talked about.

    "All I know is that if Cuttino has anything, he’s been asymptotic," Dunleavy said. "He’s never had any issue with us. There’s never been one time that he missed a practice or missed a game or had any issues in any physical of any kind for us. I mean, I’ve been told by our doctors that the things that are under concern is not something that we haven’t known about or have had any issues with. So hopefully, it won’t be an issue."

    That’s right – when the opportunity to make a math joke pops up in the world of basketball, I’m going to grasp it with both hands.

  • Election

    Earlier this week, I packed my bags and drove out to Las Vegas, Nevada, to volunteer on the ground for the Obama campaign on Election Day. This was part of their “Drive for Change” campaign, which encouraged people from California (and other states) to volunteer in battleground states. I decided that, given the historic nature of the election, and the fact that Election Day happened to fall on my birthday, I would drive out and participate.

    The organization of this was a little bit haphazard, perhaps owing to the extremely tight schedules the campaign was working under, and the fact that there were a lot of people participating in the program. Information about a meeting place wasn’t in my hands until a couple of days before I left, and I actually didn’t know specifically what I would be doing until I got there. The campaign representatives also seemed to be surprised at the level of turnout – the original intent was to use volunteers as poll watchers, but they weren’t sure that they actually had enough polling places for all the volunteers to watch. (Many people opted to do additional canvassing instead.) I was wondering if they would be seeking volunteers to drive people to the polls – the campaign, however, delegated that responsibility to the local volunteers (who know the local turf way better than the out-of-staters).

    IMAGE_076

    We estimated that there were probably 500-600 volunteers in the orientation session that I attended – there was an additional one later in the evening, as well. The couple sitting next to me had arrived as part of an organized bus trip, and got a bit of a surprise as they ran into their neighbor at the orientation. The session speaker, who would give us instructions on poll watching, was running late, and had gotten pulled over by the highway patrol on her way over for speeding. The orientation started almost an hour late, with some of that delay filled up by a short speech by Dina Titus (who ran for, and won, the 3rd congressional seat in Nevada). Later, the organizers’ attempts to herd people into manageable groups for giving assignments smacked of inexperience. The whole session was controlled chaos.

    I drew an assignment watching a polling place near the Strip, at the Stupak community center. I arrived bright and early, about half an hour before the polls opened, and introduced myself to the team there. There was one other poll watcher from the Obama campaign – a lawyer who doubled as the ‘voter protection’ representative for the polling place. There were no poll watchers from the McCain camp – it’s not clear to me, though, if it was because my polling place appeared to be in heavily Democratic territory, or because of a sheer lack of volunteers on the ground for McCain. (The information packet I got at the orientation labeled the polling location as “tier 3” – I speculate that meant that it was fairly low on the list of anticipated trouble spots.) At any rate, the county as a whole went for Obama by 18 points.

    To my surprise, a significant portion of the county election workers hadn’t worked the polls before. This inexperience was counterbalanced by the presence of several people who had worked the polls for many years. Various representatives from the county election board dropped by during the day, to ensure that things were running smoothly and that the polling place had adequate supplies. The polling process went smoothly – there were slight delays for voters in the morning (about 30 minutes, once the line built up), and a few voting machines that needed to be reset, but no major hiccups.

    My main responsibility was to gather a list of voters who had voted that day, and relay that information to the campaign. The rationale for this is that, even on Election Day, canvassers can still go out into the field and get people out to the polls. By eliminating people who have already voted, the canvassers’ efforts can be focused on those who haven’t yet voted, saving time wasted calling and knocking on doors of people who have already cast their ballots.

    The names of voters were supposed to be read off as they signed in, making it easier for poll watchers to record their data. However, due to the layout of the polling place, the poll watchers were stationed quite far away from the registration tables, so it was impractical to do this. Instead, at various times during the day, the master lists of who voted were made available to us poll watchers – we would transcribe the results on the master lists to our campaign-provided lists, and then submit that data.

    The voter information databases were updated in real-time, by one of two methods: a phone hotline, or a website. (This is the “Houdini” system that has been mentioned in post-election wrapups.) The orientation speaker claimed that the phone system would be the easier way to go – it was simply a series of voice prompts, for which you punched in precinct and voter numbers, followed by confirmation. However, the phone system was inaccessible in the morning, ostensibly due to the large volume of callers. It’s not clear to me if there was a software glitch, or a lack of capacity. Fortunately, I had decided to bring my EEE PC along with me. I tethered my phone to my laptop, and used my phone’s data plan to get Internet connectivity. I then used the website (which was still working correctly) for punching in voter information. The phone hotline was restored later in the afternoon, but I felt it was easier for me to use my laptop anyway, so I continued to use that for the rest of the day.

    There were no signs of disenfranchisement or any other bogeymen. The biggest surprise was that a street construction crew was digging a ditch just outside, blocking street access from one direction. However, following a short discussion with the construction crew, signs were put up indicating that voters needed to detour around to get to the polling place.

    As a poll watcher, you’re not allowed to speak with voters, or have any sort of campaign paraphernalia with you (since it might influence or intimidate voters). Most of this applies to the poll workers as well, and both groups adhered to these principles without any trouble. However, this did result in an amusing “election vernacular” evolving between us, though, as I believe most, if not all, of the poll workers were also Obama supporters. There were frequent mentions of how excited one was about the election, how excited one was to see all of the new voters, whether or not you were going to the Rio party (I did not, bowing to incredible exhaustion and the desire to watch the election returns until the outcome was no longer in doubt), etc. Pretty funny.

    All in all, it was a pretty interesting experience, even if it was mostly sitting, waiting, and watching. There were many people who were first-time or first-time-in-a-long-time voters, but who were clearly very motivated to come out and vote. Two Asian women had let their registrations lapse, not realizing that they would be purged after several years of inactivity. They waited patiently (and doggedly) while the poll workers confirmed with the county that they would be able to vote provisionally. One of them actually had to go home and come back to finish voting, as she had forgotten to bring her reading glasses, and needed them to fill out the provisional paper ballot. Another woman, who had one arm amputated at the elbow, said that she hadn’t voted in 30 years, but was tremendously enthusiastic about voting. Several voters came in, but were at the wrong polling place – the poll workers looked up their information online, and were able to redirect them to their appropriate polling locations. Many voters brought their kids with them, wanting them to be a part of the experience as well.

  • Vile (Yet Funny)

    On the way home today, I saw a sign spinner at the corner of MacArthur and Fairview in Costa Mesa. Here is the sign:

    IMAGE_072

    “Vote for McCain. Obama is a socialist and a friend of terrorists ! (William Ayers)”

    The “socialist” label is just ridiculous – I also like the grammatically bizarre parenthetical note on Obama’s terrorist sidekick. All of that isn’t why I find this really funny – this is:

    IMAGE_073

    This is the fellow who was holding the sign. I talked with him briefly, and asked him what the deal was with the sign. Apparently he was hired to stand on the corner and hold the sign by a man from Costa Mesa – he wasn’t sure if it was someone with the Republican party, but he thought that was likely. He is being paid $9 an hour for this work.

    Why is this funny? Well, the minimum wage in California is actually $8 an hour. (This is likely under-the-table money anyway, which is common in the day labor market and not subject to state law.) While the Obama campaign has an enormous, enthusiastic volunteer base across the country, one which I have personally seen and been a part of, the McCain campaign has built little enthusiasm and has to pay “volunteers” to get out and spread their message. Not only that, they apparently had to raise their cash offer above minimum wage in order to get someone to work for them!

    Tuesday is my birthday – I’m hoping for a good birthday present this year…

  • Grocery Store Sociology

    A somewhat famous quote from Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin:

    Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you what you are.

    The contents of the grocery basket belonging to the shopper in front of us at a grocery store in Arcata, CA:

    • One loaf of white bread (store brand)
    • A jar of peanut butter
    • A bottle of Canadian whiskey

    I now refer to this as the "grocery basket of despair."

  • Bureaucracy

    Recently, I went to the DMV in order to renew my car registration, as well as renew my driver’s license. Now, if this were a very tired comedy shtick, I would proceed to complain about how this experience wasted an entire day of mine and destroyed my soul.

    Instead, because I try to give things a fair shake, I’ll report the truth. Namely, that the DMV experience (at least in California) is not a soul-destroying experience at all, and is actually much closer to the ideal DMV experience than comedy hacks would have you believe. In the 8 years that I’ve lived in this state, my DMV visits have typically been pretty efficient and without complication, never having to endure more than a 15 minute waiting time.

    Part of that is preparation on my part — the California DMV has a "wait time estimator" for each office, and I consult that to choose a time to go over there, minimizing my waiting time. Even taking that into account, though, I don’t feel like my time is wasted at the DMV. The signs in the office are very clear, and the "take-a-number" system keeps things moving smoothly. The employees keep up a steady pace, and I have never had to get into a long discussion or argument about a form, payment, or other issue. Granted, my transactions there have always been pretty straightforward. Yet, I have dealt with many other organizations (which deal with many fewer transactions) that prove to be far more troublesome, so I don’t feel that my praise is unjustified.

    All in all, it’s a pretty streamlined bureaucracy now. So, to all comics out there who are starved of material: making fun of the DMV was low-hanging fruit back in the 1990’s. (And yes, that ridicule is certainly a reason why improvements were made.) But it’s probably time to find a new whipping boy…

  • Recycling: Too Dangerous for O.C.

    Cities, locals oppose recycling centers:

    In Huntington Beach, plans for a recycling center at a Ralphs grocery store on Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue have drawn strong opposition from city officials and residents, who say it would be unsightly, attract transients and generate noise.

    …

    Opponents say they already recycle through curbside trash programs and do not want a recycling center in their neighborhoods.

    "Having a steel outhouse in the front with cans and bottle is not appealing," said Bruce Cowgill, who owns the Huntington Beach shopping center where the Ralphs is located.

    The proposed center would be behind the supermarket near the 253-home Huntington Bay Homeowner Association neighborhood. Residents said an unlocked gate connects the two areas.

    "We just feel that we are putting ourselves in harm’s way," resident Bonnie Meakin said about the gate. "It is going to make the mother with babies and little old ladies nervous about walking through the gate."

    …

    Vazquez said it is becoming increasingly difficult to set up outdoor recycling centers in Fullerton, Irvine, Orange and San Juan Capistrano. City permits that used to take three or four months are now taking up to two years.

    "This is recycling. This is not a nuclear power plant," he said.

    This just really disgusts me. Sometimes it seems that all people want is a comfortable padded cell in which to live.

  • “Get the facts!”

    Whenever someone says, "Get the facts!," I read it as, "Please don’t look too closely at what we’re saying."

    Today was the grand opening of a new Fresh and Easy store nearby. Fresh and Easy is UK supermarket giant Tesco‘s foray into the US, consisting of smaller grocery stores, generally stocked with pre-made foods and without things like a deli or butcher department. I drove by to check it out, partly due to the huge numbers of coupons we have gotten for the chain in the mail the last few days. When I arrived, I saw that there were probably about 25 protestors in front, with signs urging me to "Get the Facts."

    I went and asked some of the protestors who were not marching in front of the store what this was all about. They gave me a flier urging me, "Don’t be fooled by Fresh & Easy," and proceeded to rattle off a litany of wide-ranging and somewhat incoherent complaints:

    • "Tesco is the Wal-Mart of the UK, and by supporting them, you’ll be taking money out of your community!" I don’t really get much mileage out of this complaint, as I feel that once you get beyond a 100-mile radius or so, you have effectively left your community behind anyway. Most U.S. grocery chains are not headquartered nearby, so I call this one a wash.
    • "Tesco is opening stores worldwide, and they’re going to treat their workers here like their workers in Thailand…like dirt! But, they treat their workers in the UK alright." This is so bizarre that it’s kind of hard to come up with a good response. After doing a bit of reading, I discovered that this was linked to union issues (discussed below).
    • "Their stores only use self-service check-out, which means that kids will easily be able to go in and buy alcohol illegally, which will lead to increased crime!" This is not a joke — this was spoken in sincerity. Apparently there has been a bill introduced in the California state assembly that would prohibit alcohol sales at stores with only self-service checkout, by requiring a full-service check stand for alcohol purchases. The link notes that Fresh and Easy would be the only retailer affected by the law. The bill does not address why this would reduce the occurrence of alcohol purchases by underage or intoxicated persons. The idea that self-service check-out is the road to teenage delinquency just strikes me as absurd, and the spectre of "increased theft" of alcohol seems bogus, since the opinion of the industry seems to be that self-service checkout results in the same or less theft.
    • "With their pre-packaged foods, they’re taking away the last line of defense between you and unsafe food!" Honestly, knowing what can go on in supermarket meat, fish, and deli departments, I’m almost more relieved than alarmed. At least with pre-packaged food there are fewer places to inspect… (Granted, our food inspection system seems to suck, too, but that’s a separate issue — the idea that grocery store employees are improving the food safety situation is pretty tenuous to me.)

      The pamphlet cites several instances of food safety violations — however, I don’t really see any skeletons that you wouldn’t find in a major American grocery retailers’ closet. So this is kind of a wash, too.

    • "Their record on environmental issues is terrible!" The website mentioned on their flyer links to a National Consumer Council report on "Green Grocers," which gives Tesco a grade of "C" for 2007. Sounds bad, right? Well, the highest grade given by the report was "B," and Tesco actually improved year-over-year from "D" to "C." A grade of "C," by the way, signifies "showing potential," while "B" is "good." The text of the report on Tesco is generally positive, with the only poor rating relating to their support of sustainable fishing.

      There’s also a link to an article claiming that Tesco drastically understates their carbon footprint. However, the complaint appears centered around two claims: 1) that their estimate does not include emissions caused by shoppers driving to and from their stores, and 2) that their estimate does not include emissions caused by their suppliers bringing goods to their stores. This is a pretty weak claim, in my opinion — if shoppers didn’t go to Tesco, they’d go somewhere else in their cars. Likewise, the goods on sale need to get to the stores somehow — otherwise, you wouldn’t have much of a store, would you?

      The people interviewed in that article also exhibit some of the same mixed-message antics as the protestors:

      Dr Sharon McClenaghan, Christian Aid’s senior policy officer, said: ‘Tesco has made some promises that it now needs to live up to. Currently, even the company’s own green auditors have said that there is still a long way to go. We are seeking assurances that the company will stick by its promises, but also ensure that it does not do so simply by axing overseas suppliers, where what’s needed is help and support from rich world companies to help them to go green too.’

      Ah yes, let’s throw in the topics of fair trade and developmental aid into what was an environmental conversation!

    • Their signs had Fresh and Easy logos in a "no smoking"-like symbol, as well as ones for Wal-Mart. I asked about this, and the one guy with whom I was speaking seemed a little embarrassed about it, and just mumbled something about "big corporations coming into neighborhoods and driving small businesses out and destroying communities." While I can understand the concern about Wal-Mart, lumping Fresh and Easy in the same boat is ridiculous in my opinion. The "neighborhood grocery" ship, in this country, sailed long before Fresh and Easy ever showed up. As a matter of fact, you could say that it was the U.S. grocery giants who killed neighborhood groceries.

      The other confusing part about this is that, as far as I can tell, Fresh and Easy’s business model isn’t based on having the lowest possible prices, like Wal-Mart’s is. It’s based around a larger number of smaller stores, in commuter-friendly locations, and about selling ready-to-eat or easy-to-prepare food at a markup. This is pretty much the complete opposite of Wal-Mart’s model, and would not be the same kind of threat to neighborhood grocers (if they existed) as Wal-Mart.

    • Something which was not said explicitly, but which I divined through a series of questions, is that their real concern is that the chain is non-union, and their fear is that if Tesco meets success in this endeavor, the industry will trend to smaller stores with fewer employees and overhead. All of the other concerns are just a smoke-screen for this.

      It seems that Tesco, despite its relationship with unions in the UK, is seeking to avoid unionization in the US. Even Barack Obama has weighed in on the issue, urging them to speak with union representatives. For their part, Fresh and Easy claim that their employees are free to organize.

    The take-away from all of this? I generally hate being lied to, or mislead, no matter who is doing the talking. It pains me when things like this happen: positions that I generally agree with, used as a smoke-screen for more odious aims, and argued in a poor, scatter-shot manner. I just get enraged when I see things like food safety discussions taking wild detours into things like environmental issues, or, my favorite, politics. These pile-ons just distract from sober discussion on how to solve a problem, and just degenerate into vitriol. It’s just embarrassing.

    Oh, and the store itself? Not bad — a few years ago I probably would have frequented it much more, but since Sandy likes to cook (and from scratch), this seems less likely to appeal to us now.